EPA’s Neonicotinoid Approval Rejected By District Court

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Thursday rejected the EPA’s approval of the insecticide sulfoxaflor (Closer, DowAgroSciences).

Advertisement

The Court, which is headquartered in San Francisco, CA, concluded that EPA violated federal law when it approved sulfoxaflor, a neonicotinoid subclass, without reliable studies regarding the impact that the insecticide would have on honeybee colonies.

The Court, which has more than two-thirds of its judges appointed by Democratic presidents, vacated EPA’s approval, meaning that sulfoxaflor may not be used in the U.S. unless, and until, EPA obtains the necessary information regarding impacts to honeybees and re-approves the insecticide in accordance with law.

Dow AgroSciences issued the following statement regarding the decision:

“Dow AgroSciences respectfully disagrees with the Ninth Circuit’s conclusion that EPA’s registration of products containing sulfoxaflor should be vacated. Dow AgroSciences will work with EPA to implement the order and to promptly complete additional regulatory work to support the registration of these products. Dow AgroSciences is also considering its available options to challenge the Court’s decision.”

Top Articles
Take Control Now of Brown Rot In Stone Fruit Crops

In addition, Dow AgroSciences advises that growers are still legally allowed to use sulfoxaflor. EPA has not reacted to this ruling and therefore it remains legal and lawful to continue use of  sulfoxaflor.

The company is working with EPA to implement the order and promptly complete additional regulatory work to support the registration of the products.

The approval was challenged by Earthjustice, a non-profit public-interest law organization based in the U.S. focusing on environmental issues, which represented a coalition of commercial beekeeping trade groups, as well as individual commercial beekeepers. The coalition included Pollinator Stewardship Council, National Honeybee Advisory Board, American Honey Producers Association, American Beekeeping Federation, and beekeepers Jeff Anderson, Rick Smith, and Brett Adee.

Earthjustice Lead Counsel Greg Loarie issued the following statement regarding the decision:

“Our country is facing widespread bee colony collapse, and scientists are pointing to pesticides like sulfoxaflor as the cause. The Court’s decision to overturn approval of this bee-killing pesticide is incredible news for bees, beekeepers, and all of us who enjoy the healthy fruits, nuts, and vegetables that rely on bees for pollination.”

 

0

Leave a Reply

Avatar for Wayne Stewart Wayne Stewart says:

District court justices are not environmental toxicologists so the ruling had to be strictly political. Earth Justice is not accurate with stating that pesticides are the cause. The preponderance of evidence indicates multiple causes, with pesticides at the bottom of the list. The main culprit is the Varroa mite (Varroa destructor). This is not good when a government agency that is charged with review and approval of pesticides can be over-ruled by a panel of politically appointed justices.

Avatar for Dan Dan says:

Who appoints the directors etc. at the EPA? It’s a revolving door with the large agri-chem and bio-chem companies. Talk about politically and financially motivated. It’s not good when a government agency that is charged with the review and approval of pesticides can approve pesticides based on internal corporate studies and lack independent studies (not “consensus” you know, the “consensus of global warming…ooops I mean climate change) headed by a director that has a financial interest it the products getting approved. Talk about the fox guarding the henhouse. Assuming a judgment is political based solely on the comment that judges are not toxicologists is faulty. If that is the case, they aren’t murder investigators either but they sit in judgment of those cases.

Avatar for Steve Miller Steve Miller says:

Since when did judges decide murder cases? I thought juries made that decision! When the insects and diseases take over and there is a shortage of food I hope these environmental nuts are prepared to stand at the back of the food line. Natures way will not feed the population of 2015 as it may have been capable of so doing in 1715, 1815, or even 1915.

Advertisement