Zebra chip disease in potatoes is currently being managed by controlling the potato psyllid with insecticides. But one Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service specialist is trying to manage the disease symptoms with alternative methods and chemistries.
The disease is caused by a bacterium, Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum, which is transmitted by the psyllid, said Dr. Ron French, AgriLife Extension plant pathologist in Amarillo.
“Biological control methods can target psyllid populations in a field, but it takes a while for them to be effective, and by then the insect has already transmitted the bacterium into the plant, especially if that psyllid flew into the field. It only takes a few hours for a psyllid to acquire and transmit the bacterium from plant to plant,” French said.
French is conducting his studies using alternative controls as a part of USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture-sponsored Zebra Chip Specialty Crop Research Initiative.
“We are looking at three different approaches: bactericides, plant defense response, and plant nutrients,” he said. “We are trying to alleviate the disease symptoms on tubers and throughout the plant, and improve plant health so that any negative impacts the psyllid, bacterium, disease, or pesticide use are having on the plant can translate into improved yields.”
His efforts to control the pathogen using foliar applications of a bactericide have had good results for two years when psyllid populations in the field and the instances of zebra chip were significant, French said. A significant increase in yield, 30%, was recorded in potato yields.
But French said the problem is the next step – getting them labeled for use on potatoes.
“Bactericides for potatoes are labeled only for seed treatments, although foliar applications in the field are allowed on some tree fruit crops. If we can include bactericides in a program that can minimize insecticide use, then this could be part of an integrated disease management approach,” he said.
In his approach to the plant defense response, French said he is trying to produce something like a systemic acquired resistance or induced systemic resistance response from the potato against the pathogen.
“To do that, we hope to use several compounds to see if the plant can actually trigger a mechanism to defend itself from the pathogen and the psyllid, as well,” he said.
“We hope to be able to do laboratory studies to determine if these systemic acquired resistance compounds work, and if so, why are they working?” French said. “Year after year there are differences in the field as far as climate, disease pressure, insect pressure – so sometimes we have to go to the lab to figure out why it works one time and not another.”
Click on the next page to read more…
The third and last approach he is studying is using plant nutrients to offset the damage caused by the psyllid or the pathogen and any nutrient imbalances that result, or any phytotoxicity that might occur after applying pesticides, French said.
“We are adding micro- and macro-nutrients and other fertilizers,” he said. A macro-nutrient is something the plant readily needs like nitrogen and phosphorus, and a micro-nutrient is something the plant needs in small amounts, like zinc or boron, for plant functions.
“In the past two years we actually had very good results with a combination of micro- and macro-nutrients that were applied bi-weekly after flowering on the potato,” French said. “We saw a 43% total yield increase in 2012 and a 45% increase in 2013 in comparison to the control or regular grower practices.”
Tuber symptoms associated with zebra chip were only as high as 3% in 2012 and 10% in 2013, but that does not take into account foliar symptoms, potential insect damage, and other yield-limiting factors, he said.
French said each year, the nutrient products used were different, so the plan is to repeat these studies in 2014 with other nutrient and non-nutrient approaches.
“We add these compounds, whether it is for plant defense responses or pathogen control plant health, on top of what the growers is applying,” he said. “So the grower would just add these to their normal application of products.”
He said he plans to repeat the studies next year, get rid of what doesn’t work, and try new chemicals, new compounds, or new products. Additionally, he said he hopes to move from small plot research to larger plots.
“For any product already labeled for potato, the idea is to convince a producer to try one or more of these approaches,” French said.
“Ideally we would like to work with compounds already labeled for potato or maybe a closely related crop, like pepper, tomato, or other solanaceous crops,” French said. “If not, it will take a little longer to get a product labeled.”
He said the nutritional approach has been used since 2006 for citrus greening or Huanglongbing, in Florida to treat the disease symptoms and yields. This disease is caused by Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus and is transmitted by the citrus psyllid.
After several years of work, French said his studies are beginning to raise more interest from the industry to get products labeled or at least tested. Good field results need to be investigated in the lab to determine why and/or how they are working, something French would like to pursue in the future.
He said he hoped to get some products labeled, if not specifically for zebra chip, at least for potato health quality, but which could still be useful on potato production fields where yields may be affected by zebra chip.
Source: Texas AgriLife Research news release