Industry Groups Praise Release Of Proposal To Create Federal Preemption For Food Labeling

The National Potato Council (NPC) and the American Seed Trade Association (ASTA) praised the release of a legislative proposal by Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman Pat Roberts that would create permanent federal preemption for food labeling requirements and urged Congress to consider and approve the legislation quickly to avoid confusion and increased costs in the marketplace.

Advertisement

Consumers, businesses, and farmers all need uniform standards based on federal determinations for food label requirements for all foods including those made with genetically modified organisms (GMO), according to NPC. A patchwork of state food labeling laws will increase costs to consumers by increasing processing and packaging costs without any associated benefit.

Vermont’s mandatory labeling law for foods containing ingredients that have been genetically modified takes effect in July and unless Congress acts swiftly, families, farmers, and food companies will face confusion and higher food costs in the market place – with low-income Americans being hit the hardest.

“U.S. potato growers thank Chairman Roberts for introducing national labeling legislation that is a reasonable, common-sense approach that provides consumers easy access to product information and will not result in increased food costs,” said John Keeling NPC Executive Vice President. “We look forward to working with both sides of the aisle to ensure that this legislation is approved by Congress in a timely manner.”

According to ASTA President and CEO Andrew LaVigne, “Time is running out for Congress to take action to prevent a patchwork of state food-labeling laws from being enacted. We applaud Chairman Roberts for putting forth a practical, national solution, and we urge the Senate to pass the proposal as soon as possible.

“ASTA has long advocated for a uniform, national food-labeling solution based on sound science,” LaVigne said. “Consumers and the food and agriculture community alike deserve consistency and transparency in the marketplace.”

 

 

Leave a Reply

Avatar for atalbott atalbott says:

I think we are really misleading the public in thinking this is going to raise prices and hurt low income Americans. Providing accurate information on a label seems like common sense and a consumers right to know. Nobody is asking to change ingredients. There is obviously concerns that a growing trend in food safety, health concerns and lack of consumer GMO knowledge/support will impact sales if labeled correctly. I get aggravated when the industry would prefer to mislead consumers rather than promote science and quality. if GMO’s are going to survive in our food system we need to take a different approach in promoting benefits, not hiding behind the curtain. Wouldn’t the goal be the consumer would buy a package because it included GMO ingredients?

Avatar for Todd Schaus Todd Schaus says:

Label all Gmo’s and let the consumer decide! Farm markets across the U.S. should also label fresh sweet corn too!
The bt trait in sweet corn kills corn borer when it feeds on plant material, yet we do not tell the general public this gmo trait is in the produce they are feeding to their kids??
They deserve the right to know and choose!!