New York IPM Program Slated To Be Cut

The New York state Integrated Pest Management (IPM) program will not be funded in the proposed New York budget. The IPM program reportedly saves millions of dollars for growers and consumers.

According to New York grower Doug Mason, who enrolled his 325 acres of sweet corn, tomatoes, and potatoes in IPM nearly 30 years ago, his savings the first year in the program were dramatic.” “Last year we didn’t use a single spray on our 200 acres of sweet corn because IPM’s trap network showed the pests weren’t there,” he says. According to Mason, he saved about $18,000 on sprays he didn’t use.

Vegetable crops won’t be the only ones impacted. New York’s apple crop-30 million bushels of apples a year-could suffer “millions of dollars” in losses without IPM research and education, notes Deborah Breth, a fruit specialist with Cornell Cooperative Extension. Codling moths alone could cause upward of $500,000 in damage. IPM’s on-farm demos show that investing an extra $150 per acre in “mating disruption” can prevent losses of $1,000 or more per acre. “Mating disruption works better the longer you use it,” says Breth. “By the third year growers can cut insecticide use by about 65%.”

The New York IPM program will end in July 2010 if funding is not reinstated. Click here for more information. 

0

Leave a Reply

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

What a tragic funding delema. IPM is the new 20th century organic style program that will help all producers. From mating disruption to spraying crops. This is a Must have program. All growers that have a computer can follow the seasons and plan on their IPM program to follow the insects and diseases so they know when to check an possibly spray. I am sure most growers dont like spaying but some times their is no choice.
Good luck New York hope funding arives in time.
Michigan grower.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

This program is research and that is one of the main purposes of the Extension program and Cornell Univ. from its beginning many years ago. If we are going to use taxpayer monies in agriculture then I think this is probably one of the most important areas to keep going. The nutrition and welfare side should be cut 100 percent first. As a veg grower and market vendor I receive Farm Market Nutrition Program checks from WIC and seniors. I would rather see that cut than lose an important area of research that benefits nearly all farmers.
TK is right, IPM is the new way to go as part of ICM, Integrated Crop Management. If NY doesn’t support IPM/ICM then we will have to look at one of the other states for the information we need.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

There is a ton of waste in all levels of government, especially in NY. That said, if a particular program directly saves a grower $, then why not step up and offer to fund some of it yourselves? I personally do not benefit much from the IPM program maybe because I already have schooling and experience in the area. Again I’ll agree with Southern Tier on this one… cut out the fluff first, especially the administration, not the boots on the ground.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

What a tragic funding delema. IPM is the new 20th century organic style program that will help all producers. From mating disruption to spraying crops. This is a Must have program. All growers that have a computer can follow the seasons and plan on their IPM program to follow the insects and diseases so they know when to check an possibly spray. I am sure most growers dont like spaying but some times their is no choice.
Good luck New York hope funding arives in time.
Michigan grower.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

This program is research and that is one of the main purposes of the Extension program and Cornell Univ. from its beginning many years ago. If we are going to use taxpayer monies in agriculture then I think this is probably one of the most important areas to keep going. The nutrition and welfare side should be cut 100 percent first. As a veg grower and market vendor I receive Farm Market Nutrition Program checks from WIC and seniors. I would rather see that cut than lose an important area of research that benefits nearly all farmers.
TK is right, IPM is the new way to go as part of ICM, Integrated Crop Management. If NY doesn’t support IPM/ICM then we will have to look at one of the other states for the information we need.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

There is a ton of waste in all levels of government, especially in NY. That said, if a particular program directly saves a grower $, then why not step up and offer to fund some of it yourselves? I personally do not benefit much from the IPM program maybe because I already have schooling and experience in the area. Again I’ll agree with Southern Tier on this one… cut out the fluff first, especially the administration, not the boots on the ground.