EPA Moves On The Clean Air Act

In a move that could have far-reaching impacts on businesses down to the grower level, EPA last week announced that greenhouse-gas emissions would be regulated under the Clean Air Act. EPA administrator Lisa Jackson said that these gases endanger public health and welfare of future generations.

Advertisement

The finding will be followed by a 60-day comment period, after which EPA could begin drawing up regulations. It is believed those regulations would focus first on automobile emissions, but eventually could target power plants, factories, and other businesses.

Agribusiness could be affected by the new regulations. In November, the Florida Farm Bureau issued an Action Alert on how this move might impact some in agriculture. Once an endangerment finding is made, Title V of the Clean Air Act requires that any entity with the potential to emit more than 100 tons per year of a regulated pollutant must obtain a permit in order to continue to operate.

For previously regulated pollutants, a threshold of 100-tons meant that only the largest of emitters were required to be permitted. For greenhouse gases, the situation is much different. Not only would power plants and factories, but also many office and apartment buildings, schools, hospitals, large churches and even large homes would be regulated. According to the alert, literally hundreds of thousands of entities could be required to obtain permits.

The vast majority of livestock operations would easily meet the 100 ton threshold and fall under regulation. In fact, USDA has stated that any operation with more than 25 dairy cows, or 50 beef cattle would have to obtain permits. According to USDA statistics, this would cover about 99% of dairy production and more than 90% of beef production in the U.S.

As the proposal stood in November, the permit fees would equate to a “tax” of $175 per dairy cow and $87.50 per beef cow.

President Obama has stated that he would rather Congress take on the issue and pass cap and trade legislation, which would cap the levels of pollution an entity could emit. If the business exceeds the cap, it would in effect have to pay a tax for the right to pollute.

Regardless if Congress passes cap and trade, Friday’s EPA finding could likely have the same effect as regulations are put into place over the next few years.

Click here to read the Florida Farm Bureau’s action alert.

To read EPA’s press release on the decision, click here.

 

Leave a Reply

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

Lets see now. Plants produce consume CO2 but all plant debris when it decays also releases CO2, so just like the cows, is there going to be a tax on all compost piles. Gee whiz, they all produce methane too under the right composting situations. Can we get another tax there too. This has gone too far and the EPA is running AMOK.

Read some history and see whether the EPA is running a bit amok like Moses in the rein of La Guardia in New York city during the late thirties. Is the EPA becoming a law or an amoeba of ever expanding tentacles similar to the New York Authorities that were accountable to no one after establishment???

It is time to stop the takover and state that the King is wearing no Clothes.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

While I may not agree with policies that may come forward it sure would be hard to farm if half the Central Valley was under water.
Climate change may not be human caused and there is nothing we can do to change it but I think in their hearts everyone knows that the things we need to do are right for the environment.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

Lets see now. Plants produce consume CO2 but all plant debris when it decays also releases CO2, so just like the cows, is there going to be a tax on all compost piles. Gee whiz, they all produce methane too under the right composting situations. Can we get another tax there too. This has gone too far and the EPA is running AMOK.

Read some history and see whether the EPA is running a bit amok like Moses in the rein of La Guardia in New York city during the late thirties. Is the EPA becoming a law or an amoeba of ever expanding tentacles similar to the New York Authorities that were accountable to no one after establishment???

It is time to stop the takover and state that the King is wearing no Clothes.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

While I may not agree with policies that may come forward it sure would be hard to farm if half the Central Valley was under water.
Climate change may not be human caused and there is nothing we can do to change it but I think in their hearts everyone knows that the things we need to do are right for the environment.