Agriculture Advocates Skewer Latest ‘Dirty Dozen’ Produce Report

Spring has sprung. And along with the change of season comes the annual release of Environmental Working Group’s “Shopper’s Guide to Pesticides in Produce.” The organization’s report comprises 12 fruits and vegetables found to be most contaminated with pesticides, reportedly based on USDA data. In addition, EWG’s report also highlights what it calls the “Clean Fifteen,” produce that tested low in concentrations of pesticide residues. News of the annual report’s release is always picked up and distributed by mainstream media. This year is no different. Also the same for 2026 is the effort put forth by produce industry advocates to help set the record straight amid the mixed messages.

In response to the latest “Dirty Dozen” report, the Alliance for Food and Farming released a statement. Here is a portion:

The Environmental Working Group’s (EWG) “Dirty Dozen” report once again villainizes safe, healthy, and affordable fruits and vegetables by misrepresenting USDA pesticide data.

A flawed approach

In its usual approach, EWG overstates the risk of consumer pesticide exposure by leaving out a key detail: more than 99% of the commodities sampled by the U.S. Department of Agriculture in its annual Pesticide Data Program (PDP) report (the source material for the EWG report) have residues well below the stringent safety standards set by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). EWG has attempted to justify the methodology used by comparing pesticide levels in various foods with those in the urine of people who ate those foods. However, this new approach is riddled with errors and data manipulation.

USDA reports have consistently shown over the years that the latest report demonstrates that the vast majority of the commodities sampled had residues well below the established EPA safety standards, and more than 42% had no detectable residues.

The PDP tests a wide variety of both domestic and imported foods with a strong focus on those commonly fed to infants and children. Fresh and processed fruit and vegetables made up 92.8% of the 9.872 tested samples, including: apples, avocados, blackberries (fresh and frozen), cherry tomatoes, cucumbers, head lettuce, leaf lettuce, onions, oranges, pineapples (fresh and frozen), potatoes, canned pumpkin, sweet corn (fresh and frozen), and tomatillos.

These data are further supported by FDA’s latest Pesticide Residue Monitoring Program Report and its new Pesticide Report Data Dashboard.

The USDA and FDA reports clearly demonstrate that, when farmers use pesticides, they follow the stringent laws and regulations governing pesticide use to provide safe and healthy fruits and vegetables for America’s families, including their own.

Consumers are negatively impacted

The Alliance for Food and Farming (AFF) has previously pointed out that peer-reviewed research published in the Journal of Toxicology found that the recommendation in the “Dirty Dozen” list to substitute organic forms of produce for conventional does not result in any decrease in risk for consumers because residues on conventionally grown produce are so low, if present at all.

The EWG openly states that one goal of its Dirty Dozen report is to drive consumers toward organic produce, which costs significantly more than conventionally grown produce, and offers equal health benefits. It is well known and widely accepted that a diet rich in fruits and vegetables is a keystone of healthy nutrition. Studies have shown, however, that lower-income and cost-conscious consumers do not respond to the EWG report by purchasing only organic products: instead, they are increasingly likely to avoid fruits and vegetables altogether.

In a report released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), only 1 in 10 Americans consumes enough fruits and vegetables each day, unchanged from previous survey levels reported almost a decade ago. The report states that those living below or near the poverty level were the least likely to meet produce recommendations. 

Click here to read the full statement.


What are your thoughts on this topic? Leave a reader comment below.

6

Leave a Reply

Avatar for Eric Bjerregaard Eric Bjerregaard says:

I am always disgusted and amazed to see different brassicas ton both that I grow and treat exactly the same on both of these lists. The ewg is a corrupt organization.

Avatar for Margaret NOON Margaret NOON says:

We are grateful to have the EWG. People want to minimize their pesticide exposure.
As a certified organic farmer I do my pest to grow the cleanest organic produce for families.
Just like a physician I believe my job is to do no harm.
Organic farming is more challenging and I understand why conventional farmers resist taking it on. My two neighboring farmers died young due to cancers related to products like roundup. One of these farmers last words to me was ” you know roundup is killing farmers.” He died a month later.

Avatar for Joseph Heckman PhD Heckman PhD Joseph Heckman PhD Heckman PhD says:

Hi Margaret,
I agree and am grateful to EWG for promotion of organic farming. Glyphosate and other pesticides are a legitimate health concern. The public needs to be able to hold pesticide makers accountable. Say NO to legal immunity for pesticide companies.
lancasterfarming.com/imagine-life-without-glyphosate-opinion/article_03a4b7c2-c30f-507a-8c95-016a434abc1c.html

Avatar for Eric Bjerregaard Eric Bjerregaard says:

Margaret and Joseph, roundup is killing farmers? This is at best an egregious error. The AHS with a sample size of over 50,000 applicators and their families has found no evidence of carcinogenicity. None of the regulatory agencies that have ruled agrees with you and your allegedly dead farmer. Only the iarc says “probable carcinogen “ and one of their’s chris portier, got caught taking 160,000from tort attorneys. Organic farming is a fraudulent marketing scheme with no significant benefits to either the environment or the or its customers-victims. It is based on the appeal to nature fallacy. You and margaret either have no clue or are deliberately spreading misinformation. Conventional farmers actually farming is the method that requires more expertise in order to be successful. There are far more products and principles to learn.

Avatar for Eric Bjerregaard Eric Bjerregaard says:

Your claims of farmers dying are ludicrous. You have no proof. See my comment below for more.

Avatar for Joseph Heckman PhD Heckman PhD Joseph Heckman PhD Heckman PhD says:

Glyphosate Safety Study Retracted Amid Monsanto Ghostwriting Concerns
A 2000 paper in Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology claiming glyphosate (the active ingredient in Roundup) is safe for humans has been formally retracted after evidence emerged that Monsanto employees ghostwrote it and may have paid the authors Chemical & Engineering News+1.

Avatar for Eric Bjerregaard Eric Bjerregaard says:

Try pondering your own citation. There is nothing in it to indicate. That glyphosate is a carcinogen. Zip, squat, nada. None of the writing was proven false. Why? Because they wrote the truth. Which is probably why they didn’t bother to do a good job hiding their ghosts. They knew and still know. That they are correct.