Organization Seeks Winegrape Exemption Produce Safety Rule

Organization Seeks Winegrape Exemption Produce Safety Rule

The California Association of Winegrape Growers (CAWG) has requested FDA exempt winegrapes from its produce safety rule under the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) and place them on a list of produce commodities rarely consumed raw. The action would exempt growers and wineries from having to comply with unnecessary and burdensome requirements and paperwork under the rule.

Advertisement

On June 15, CAWG President John Aguirre sent a letter and 10-page whitepaper to FDA detailing CAWG’s request. More than 30 commodities, such as potatoes and asparagus, are listed as rarely consumed raw and thus exempt from the produce safety rule. FDA determined these commodities are nearly always cooked or otherwise processed before consumption, thus eliminating risks of foodborne illness. CAWG argued that winegrapes are also not grown, harvested, or sold to consumers for fresh consumption; they are almost universally grown and sold for processing into wine. As such, winegrapes should also be exempt from the produce safety rule.

“When FDA published its produce safety rule, the agency acknowledged that making wine from grapes effectively eliminates any risk of foodborne illness that might occur with raw grapes,” Aguirre said. “However, FDA failed to include winegrapes on the list of commodities rarely consumed raw because the agency feared growers of cabernet sauvignon, pinot noir, chardonnay, and other varietals may sell those grapes for fresh consumption. Our letter to FDA should provide sufficient information for the agency to determine that California winegrapes are distinct from table- and raisin-type grapes and are rarely consumed raw.”

Currently, winegrape growers can only obtain an exemption from the produce safety rule by adhering to specific notice and assurance requirements under the rule’s processing exemption. Beginning with the 2018 harvest, FDA will require growers provide written notice with each load of winegrapes shipped that the grapes have not been processed. Starting in 2020, wineries will need to provide assurance to growers that the winegrapes received were indeed processed into wine. Growers are required to maintain a record of these notices and assurance transactions for up to two years. Failure to follow these steps precisely may invalidate the processing exemption and force winegrape growers to comply with the many provisions of the produce safety rule.

“It’s absurd to think that a Santa Barbara County winegrape grower would sell ‘Pinot Noir’ or ‘Chardonnay’ grapes into fresh table or raisin grape market channels,” CAWG director Mike Testa, of Coastal Vineyard Care, said. “All commercial winegrape production in Santa Barbara County, as in many other California counties, is destined for a fermentation tank. FDA’s produce safety rule should acknowledge that and exempt winegrapes.”

Leave a Reply

Keith Pritchard says:

FDA should have nothing to do with winegrapes nor wineries. The FSMA is nothing but a bloated mass of over regulation that will put many businesses out of business leaving very large ones that will have more problems with food safety than any small business. We rank behind many countries that have a lot less nuisance regulation such as egg washing and pasteurization requirements. About everything they tout is a death knell for quality and promotion of mediocrity for the sake of not much if any safety improvement. Letting them have any access to any alcoholic beverage business is totally absurd and the GMP inspection loophole is totally irresponsible. There is already nothing from a food safety standpoint to put to your lips on the planet than wine. Regulating wine grapes is totally bizarre and irrational.

croploss says:

For all of you who voted for Obama you are enjoying the rewards. Otherwise tell it to Trump who can do something about one more out of control government bureaucracy

Keith Pritchard says:

This FSMA new regulation is going to the absurd extreme. There needs to be adjustments to eliminate wine grapes and alcoholic beverage producers form all of it. We are regulated by TTB and many states alcoholic beverage agencies. Wine kills human pathogens and has no history of food safety issues, and since licensing passed in an Ohio 2009 budget bill (by surprise) we have been subject to food processing licensing and regulation by the Ohio Department of Agriculture. This is duplicate of licensing and regulation as provided in Ohio liquor codes. Many other states exempt from this sort of duplicate licensing and regulation. Ohio’s and the FDA regulation is superfluous, unnecessary, duplicate and also discriminates against Ohio wineries by wineries from out of state that are not subject to the same food processing licensing and regulatory costs that sell wholesale in Ohio. As a traditional artisan winemaker that values microbial diversity in the vineyard and winery environment I also find the regulation is in direct opposition to my winemaking principles. http://www.FreeTheWineries.com or http://www.facebook.com/FreeTheWineries

helen baran says:

hooray for them I hope other grape processors can follow this idea. Our concord grapes go into wine and juice and other products —sold by our cooperative. Thank you for posting this story and I hope it helps more grape growers and processors.