Obama Signs Food Safety Bill

On Tuesday, Jan. 4, President Obama signed the $1.4 billion food safety bill into law, despite some lawmakers complaining about the price of the bill and threatening its funding.

Advertisement

The legislation — the first major overhaul of food safety since the 1930s — will increase government inspections at food-processing plants and also will give FDA the right to order recalls.

For more on the legislation,and.

Join our discussion about the topic on Produce Community by clicking here.

Do you have questions about the new food safety law? We’ll be running an in-depth report on the topic in an upcoming issue of the magazine and invite you to send us your questions, which will be answered by experts and included in the magazine. E-mail questions to [email protected].

Top Articles
18 Cool Cucumber Varieties You Will Want To Grow

0

Leave a Reply

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

With all the audits and inspection fee to be assessed against fruit and vegetable farms the price of production will have to placed on the consumers. It would have been more effective to spend this money on teaching comsumers how to prepare and cook their food verses heading down the road where sneeze/bird poop guards will have to be install around each plant as a good agricultural practice. Lets not fool ourselves about foreign food safety in this bill. NAFTA and other trade treats make this bill ineffective. The only ones getting kicked in the Butt are American Farmers. results more foriegn food imports and less American Farmers.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

Hi,
There was clearly a need to do something to improve food safety. Given the number of recalls in the last few years, industry was clearly failing at policing itself, and the upshot was that the federal government got involved.
Was this the best bill? I doubt it. The big question is whether improved food safety measures will improve consumer confidence. If it does, and people in this country recognize that American farmers are committed to providing a safe product, we should all win.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

Repeal it. Let growers write a bill will solve the problem. The no-count congress has no idea of the problems they make rather than solve then have to waste time to fix.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

Tired of the phrase, “first major overhaul of food safety since the 1930s”, and some reporter saying there are 70+ million cases of food poisoning each year.
First, maybe there hasn’t been a need to “overhaul” the food bill but only needs minor changes. Seems to me the farmers of this country, large and small, have been doing a pretty good job feeding the people.
Second, I looked at the report about the millions of food poisonings each year. It is an ancient report from the mid 90s. When you actually read the words you find the people who came up with the report GUESSED at most of their numbers and in some cases used incredibly small and isolated tests from the 70s and 50s to “extrapolate” numbers of illnesses and deaths. This whole report isn’t worth the paper it is printed on.
This monstrosity of a law is what we get for allowing govt and all its inefficiencies to tell us what is necessary and needs to be done.
Time to invest in huge plastic shields and sanitation chemicals. Chlorine manufacturers have to love this law.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

With current proceedures in place, such as third party audits, GAP, etc; don’t you think the grocers need accountability?
I visit a grocery store and see beautiful (not always) produce thrown into bins, left for the public’s selection without barriers to keep the wet sneezes, coughs, dirty hands & other disease transmission possibilities barricaded.
Produce can leave the Grower in excellent, safe condition and contamination occurs at the display for purchase.
The burden should not be exclusive on the Grower. Retailers need accountability too.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

Will more laws and regulations prove to be effective when the governemnt can’t police the laws already in effect? The FDA is corrupt and also as I understand it, this bill doesn’t do anything about meat products. Throwing more money (in this case 1.4 Billion) at a problem that money doesn’t fix is bad for every citizen of this country. Somebody, as in the consumer, has to pay for this. Just more hope and change we didn’t need.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

Even though us small farmers were made exempt from this bill, thank you Mr. Tester. We are not out from under the eye of the govt. Ms. Napolitano only has to have a suspicion of a farm that might have contaminated produce for the govt to come and shut it down. This has the effect of making us have to comply with much of what is in the bill on a “just in case” basis.
This coupled with the huge increase in the cost of fuel will create higher food prices for American food. Not necessarily imported food.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

With all the audits and inspection fee to be assessed against fruit and vegetable farms the price of production will have to placed on the consumers. It would have been more effective to spend this money on teaching comsumers how to prepare and cook their food verses heading down the road where sneeze/bird poop guards will have to be install around each plant as a good agricultural practice. Lets not fool ourselves about foreign food safety in this bill. NAFTA and other trade treats make this bill ineffective. The only ones getting kicked in the Butt are American Farmers. results more foriegn food imports and less American Farmers.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

Hi,
There was clearly a need to do something to improve food safety. Given the number of recalls in the last few years, industry was clearly failing at policing itself, and the upshot was that the federal government got involved.
Was this the best bill? I doubt it. The big question is whether improved food safety measures will improve consumer confidence. If it does, and people in this country recognize that American farmers are committed to providing a safe product, we should all win.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

Repeal it. Let growers write a bill will solve the problem. The no-count congress has no idea of the problems they make rather than solve then have to waste time to fix.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

Tired of the phrase, “first major overhaul of food safety since the 1930s”, and some reporter saying there are 70+ million cases of food poisoning each year.
First, maybe there hasn’t been a need to “overhaul” the food bill but only needs minor changes. Seems to me the farmers of this country, large and small, have been doing a pretty good job feeding the people.
Second, I looked at the report about the millions of food poisonings each year. It is an ancient report from the mid 90s. When you actually read the words you find the people who came up with the report GUESSED at most of their numbers and in some cases used incredibly small and isolated tests from the 70s and 50s to “extrapolate” numbers of illnesses and deaths. This whole report isn’t worth the paper it is printed on.
This monstrosity of a law is what we get for allowing govt and all its inefficiencies to tell us what is necessary and needs to be done.
Time to invest in huge plastic shields and sanitation chemicals. Chlorine manufacturers have to love this law.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

With current proceedures in place, such as third party audits, GAP, etc; don’t you think the grocers need accountability?
I visit a grocery store and see beautiful (not always) produce thrown into bins, left for the public’s selection without barriers to keep the wet sneezes, coughs, dirty hands & other disease transmission possibilities barricaded.
Produce can leave the Grower in excellent, safe condition and contamination occurs at the display for purchase.
The burden should not be exclusive on the Grower. Retailers need accountability too.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

Will more laws and regulations prove to be effective when the governemnt can’t police the laws already in effect? The FDA is corrupt and also as I understand it, this bill doesn’t do anything about meat products. Throwing more money (in this case 1.4 Billion) at a problem that money doesn’t fix is bad for every citizen of this country. Somebody, as in the consumer, has to pay for this. Just more hope and change we didn’t need.

Avatar for Anonymous Anonymous says:

Even though us small farmers were made exempt from this bill, thank you Mr. Tester. We are not out from under the eye of the govt. Ms. Napolitano only has to have a suspicion of a farm that might have contaminated produce for the govt to come and shut it down. This has the effect of making us have to comply with much of what is in the bill on a “just in case” basis.
This coupled with the huge increase in the cost of fuel will create higher food prices for American food. Not necessarily imported food.

Advertisement