Why Farmers Need To Meet Tech Companies Halfway

Many of you will find farm labor near-impossible to obtain at some point in the coming years. We are constantly looking to farm technology because  we believe that’s where the solutions lie to this vexing problem, and we want to help. We listen to you about your problems, and we attend trade shows, etc. talking to folks from the technological developers who are trying to supply you answers.

Advertisement

It’s clear many of you don’t think some of the companies are sufficiently focused on your needs. That’s definitely changing. The tenor of the presentations I hear from high-tech equipment providers increasingly begins with a focus on the grower. It seems to me there is a renewed sense among these companies that they need to make more of an effort to meet you at least halfway if they are going to really understand your problems and provide you answers.

Look no further than the story “The Future of AI in Agriculture” written by Jan Johnson of Millennium Research. She notes that Founder and CEO Gabe Sibley of Verdant Robotics says growers want simple solutions that make their lives easier and their farms more profitable. He also touched on one particular complaint I’ve heard many times over the past several years, that tech provides a lot of data but no way to use it.

“We took about six months on the road talking with growers who said, ‘Do not give us more data, we have too much data. Tell us what to do with it, or better yet, go do it,’” Sibley says. “You have to perform an action that delivers. You actually have to do the work, not give them data or say this is going to be great one day, just go do a job. So that’s what we are delivering — automated weed control in specialty crops.”

I can’t tell you how refreshing it was to read Sibley’s statements. Even more encouraging, especially as the example pertains to fruit, Johnson cites the comments of Omar Gomez, Washington Lead Executive for Hectre. His company’s technology, which you may have read about in American Fruit Grower last year, allows growers or fieldmen to take a picture of the top layer of apples in a bin, and the artificial intelligence (AI) in the app predicts the sizes and distribution of all apples within the bin.

Top Articles
Avoid These Mistakes When Flying Drones Over Your Farm Field

“So then when Walmart calls you and says, ‘I want this specific size,’ you can say, ‘I know I can fill that order’ because of the accuracy and the inventory management software,” Gomez says. “Ultimately that increases the bottom line for the grower, and the relationship between the wholesaler and the shipper is strong. So that’s what we’re seeing: the great value back for our customer at the moment.”

Increasing your bottom line is obviously vital, but the solutions are so complex, I believe it will take close relationships between tech companies and growers. Sibley says that may be the means for the tech to really take off.

“The most important reason to partner is because right now it’s like the 1950s, and we just invented the transistor,” Sibley says. “The value we’re going to find, when we really digitize and have these machines out there doing this work, is yet to be discovered. And we get to do that collaboratively with the grower and accelerate that discovery by being there, boots on the ground, working shoulder to shoulder with them. They’re pulling us to do that collaboration.”

Meet these tech companies and partner with as many as you can. You’ve got to prepare for the day when the workers don’t return.

5

Leave a Reply

Avatar for Matt Matt says:

It’s all academic as MOST growers can not afford this technology. When margins are less than 5% in many cases where does the money come from? The article says “When Wal-Mart calls.” That is a joke right?

I would be willing to bet less than 1% of growers have anything even remotely close to a situation like that.

The apple bin example might be a spend if it was an app on a phone that was relatively inexpensive. If it’s multiple thousands of dollars or more then it’s only for the very largest growers.

This also isn’t the 1950s. Row Trac machine guidance, variable rate fertilizer application, etc. These are two technologies that have been democratized and are within reach of MOST growers. The second can be automated based on either previous harvest data or soil sampling.

How about a portable tissue nutrient analyzer? Tissue analysis is the gold standard. It can take weeks to get a response. In many cases this means tissue analysis data is too old to take full effective use of the data it provides.

I can think of a lot more examples, but referring to current ag as the 1950s is patronizing. Farmers use as much technology as they can afford and easily apply. If you need a doctorate to apply the data then it is wasted dollars for many growers.

How about automated weed/crop identification? Europe has automated seeders for specialty crops. If someone could bring the costs down on this technology it would provide a viable alternative to herbicides for many crops. Right now it only makes sense on the very largest of farms who can afford the technology or for medium to large organic farms where there is still a price premium.

How about skilled labor sourcing and availability? You know how nice it would be to go to a website and look for 20 skilled workers for three to four weeks? It doesn’t exist. A service that would remove all the paperwork, head hunting, lodging, visa processing (if applicable), etc. Just pick the crop, the date range, skill level and needed services (weeding, harvesting, pack house, etc.), language capabilities of employee. THAT would be revolutionary. Sort of like a Robert Half for agriculture.

How about automate drone spraying? Maybe as a service. Need a field of squash oor pumpkin sprayed. A drone service (rental or co-op) or an inexpensive drone to ppurchase. I would fork over good money for a drone that could spray 3-5 acres with an insecticide in one go. No running over a crop, no wasted field space on drive rows, reduced compaction, spray oddly shaped fields with more accuracy. I know some companies are working on this, but the costs right now for a unit that can do ACTUAL work vs test plots is prohibitive. These are essentially helicopters with a gps receiver and some kind of computer and telecommunications to monitor it. 50k for a drone that can carry 5-10 gallons or less is bit much. Once it can carry 50-100 gallons then we have something that is very interesting.

The problem is many of these tech companies are not talking to farmers. Think like John Deere or other traditional ag companies. They at least have some idea of what the farmer really needs even if they price their tools like their gold plated.

Avatar for Rick Rick says:

If Wal-Mart called me and said “I need this size…” I’d tell them to place an order with Mother Nature and then get back to me.

Advertisement