Can American Agriculture Save The World?

Can American Agriculture Save The World?

In agricultural circles, it is common to preach to the choir that —“We feed and clothe the world.” Then the statistics follow about the productivity of the American farmer now feeding 155 people. It makes us feel good and reminds those of us in the business of growing food that agriculture carries the world on its shoulders.

But, what do those talking points really mean? If you are in the business, you’ve heard the stats so often that just maybe they don’t mean anything anymore other than something akin to a cheer.

One of the figures rattled off often is that by 2050 our global population will be at or above nine billion people. We are adding about 80 million people a year. That means we are adding the population of Germany to the planet every year.

Advertisement

We will need to increase food production 70% by 2050 to meet the demands of the growing population. We have 35 growing seasons to get there — or about the career of grower here in America. That’s not that long, so growers, science, and industry must mobilize now to increase the productivity of agriculture across the globe.

As a Florida grower worried about managing the day-to-day challenges of remaining viable in the face of HLB, foreign competition, and market crashes due to overproduction of a particular crop, what happens in 2050 probably fades in importance in the heat of keeping the wheels on the tractor and farming for another day. But, the challenge of feeding nine billion should matter to you and every one of the rest of us. That’s because it will largely fall on the shoulders of American farmers to meet this global challenge.

USDA Global Soil Regions map from November 2005

Image courtesy of USDA

Four Soils

Dr. Paul Genho knows land and the importance of soils in growing food. He recently retired from AgReserves Inc. where he was in charge of land acquisitions. He also served as general manager over Deseret Ranches for 17 years.
Genho recently outlined the importance of America in feeding the world during a speech at the Lay Of The Land Conference hosted by Dean Saunders Real Estate. He showed attendees the USDA’s soils map of the globe and pointed out four soil types.

The Mollisols are the most productive soils in the world and spread across much of the midwestern U.S. They developed on the great prairie and were enriched by thousands of years of buffalo grazing. The Alfisols crossing the northeastern U.S. are next most productive and developed under hardwood forests. The third most productive soil type is the Ultisols, which formed under pine wood forests and are found in North Florida and the Southeast. The fourth most productive soil is the Oxisols, which formed under the tropical rainforests in South America.

“Those four soil types account for 90% of the food production in the world,” Genho said. “Now, look at Africa, India, and China. None of these countries have an abundance of these soils or the capacity to feed themselves.”

Genho added those three countries are the areas where the population is growing the fastest and already account for 3.6 billion of the world’s current 7.2 billion people. So, it will come down to the Americas, particularly the U.S., to help feed these burgeoning regions.

Paul Genho speaking at Florida Agriculture Financial Management Conference

Paul Genho
Photo by Frank Giles

Genho emphasized how blessed our country is and why it is the bread basket of the world. While America only makes up 6.7% of the land area and only 4.2% of the global population, the country has 21% of the world’s most productive Mollisols. And, it has 10% of the Alfisols on the planet.

“We also are blessed with having 21% of the [land area] where it rains [regularly],” he said. “On the soils map, you see a lot of Mollisols in the steps of South Asia and the Ukraine, but they have little groundwater and infrequent rain.”

The best soils in the world and good water are augmented by a cheap highway to move all that is grown here in the Mississippi River. In Brazil, which has huge land area of Oxisols does not have this transportation infrastructure. Genho said he had visited the Mato Grosso in Brazil to consider a land purchase that required a haul of several hundred miles on a clay road, which couldn’t even be driven on when it rained.

A second issue adding to the food production challenge is the rise of the middle class across the globe. By 2030, the middle class is estimated to grow to 4.3 billion up from the 1.3 billion today. Those people will demand a higher quality diet that includes meat, milk, nuts, and fresh fruits and vegetables.

“The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization estimates we are going to need to produce 70% more food than today by 2050,” Genho said. “Where is this food going to be produced? On the shifting sands of Lower Africa? It is going to be produced in North and South America, and in particular the U.S., because we are the only people with the capacity to greatly increase food production and address this driving issue.”

♦ Click to the next page to see why it is so important. ♦

Leave a Reply

Richard Funt says:

I agree with all points made. However with increasing numbers migrating into Europe plus the amount of poverty, many people can not afford the world price of food plus the cost of transporting it. It makes sense to improve locally grown food in many foreign countries. Locally grown food is fresh, low cost and more nutritious in some cases.. How about a Land Grant University system in Eastern Europe, Africa and South America?

Mr. Funt I agree with the locally grown being able save on costs, food prices, etc. I think that’s great along with land grants would help out a lot. BUT what I fear are the chemical companies stepping in & screwing up the works. Something I wish American Farmers would realize is that they don’t need chemicals they need Mother Nature. Thank you – Vince

walker says:

Dr. Genho and Mr. Giles nicely set up the problem.The proposed solution is off target. Mr. Funt is very close to the “bulls eye” but I believe Vince is off target to say we don’t need technology(chemicals in his vernacular). What we need is appropriate technology and to expand on Mr. Funt’s thesis what we need is bio-regional economies. Our Land Grants unfortunately are hampered by political boundaries that cross bio regions. Through a system, of perhaps tariffs, to limit movement of products in and out of bio-regions but not prevent movement, economies can provide real time biofeedback mechanism to the problem of growth and consumerism. Agriculture is now controlled by food Oligarchs. The purpose of government is to control these oligarchs contrary to Mr. Giles solution of deregulation. Such things as genes are rightfully property of the commons and patents should absolutely expire and revert to the commons. The process of patent extensions should be stopped.

Yes to local markets! Yes to world wide Land Grants! Yes to public funding them! Lets get our vision right and then set our objectives to appropriate technology for the bio-regions!

We can do this!

Walker

[…] at Putnam pushes for Water Policy.  This issue also has an article with an interesting look at agriculture’s role in feeding the world, and how soils play a major role in food […]